PPAP Checklist

Use the PPAP Checklist to review the part production process in line with AIAG guidelines, to gain full approval for production and shipment of parts.

PPAP Checklist



Control Plan (CP)

1. Does it comply with the AIAG format or an equivalent standard?


Photo Comment

2. Is the plan type clearly identified as Prototype, Safe Launch/Pre-Production, or Production?


Photo Comment

3. Are DC/SC/CC and other pertinent characteristics identified?


Photo Comment

4. Are the type and frequency of the control deemed adequate?


Photo Comment

5. Does the plan include annual revalidation activities?


Photo Comment

6. Are off-line and/or off-site processes included, such as Rework, Warehouse Activity, Receiving, Shipping, etc.?


Photo Comment

7. Are defect/poke-yoke masters identified where applicable?


Photo Comment
Process Failure Mode Effects And Analysis (PFMEA)

1. Does it comply with the AIAG FMEA Manual, with appropriate rankings?


Photo Comment

2. Do the print date and level match?


Photo Comment

3. Are DC/SC/CCs addressed?


Photo Comment

4. Are the highest RPNs/severity addressed, with a target RPN < 100?


Photo Comment

5. Are typical/historical failure modes addressed?


Photo Comment
Dimensional Results

1. Does the report comply with the AIAG format or an equivalent standard?


Photo Comment

2. Is the correct part number and change level specified?


Photo Comment

3. Are the marked dimensions matched with the ballooned print, and are they within specifications?


Photo Comment

4. Is the OK/NOT OK column checked?


Photo Comment

5. Is the supporting documentation dated within six (6) months, and is the dimensional data within three (3) months?


Photo Comment
Material Tests

1. Does the report comply with the AIAG format or an equivalent standard?


Photo Comment

2. Are the test results reported per specification and/or print?


Photo Comment

3. Do the test results conform with specifications and are performed within six (6) months?


Photo Comment

4. Are the tests performed at an accredited facility, and is there proof of accreditation and scope, such as ISO/TS 16949 Internal Labs - ISO/IEC 17025?


Photo Comment
Material Tests

1. Does the report comply with the AIAG format or an equivalent standard?


Photo Comment

2. Are the test results reported per specification and/or print?


Photo Comment

3. Do the test results conform with specifications and are performed within six (6) months?


Photo Comment

4. Were the tests performed at an accredited facility, and is there proof of accreditation and scope, such as ISO/TS 16949 Internal Labs - ISO/IEC 17025?


Photo Comment
Material Tests

1. Are the studies performed per AIAG standards or an equivalent standard?


Photo Comment

2. Is the part number and change level correct?


Photo Comment

3. Do the Special Characteristics have Cpk studies per SQM requirements?


Photo Comment

4. Is the data normally distributed, and does it meet the SQM Ppk (Short Term) / Cpk (Long Term) requirements?


Photo Comment

5. Were the studies performed within six (6) months of the submission date?


Photo Comment
Material Tests

1. Does the report comply with the AIAG format or an equivalent standard?


Photo Comment

2. Are the gage names and characteristics identified?


Photo Comment

3. Are the studies performed per an acceptable AIAG method?


Photo Comment

4. Are the studies conducted on all gages used on DC/SC/CC features, at a minimum (including On-Line Gages and Testers)?


Photo Comment

5. Are the studies done within six (6) months?


Photo Comment

6. Do the results meet AIAG guidelines (GR&R < 10% acceptable, 10-30% may be Acceptable Based on Application, >30% Need Improvement Plan)?


Photo Comment
Bulk Material

1. Is the PPAP accompanied by a Bulk Materials Checklist that meets SQM requirements?


Photo Comment
Sample Parts

1. Are samples included?


Photo Comment
Checking Aids

1. Are checking aids included?


Photo Comment
Customer Specific Requirements

1. Are additional customer-required documents included?


Photo Comment
Packaging Information

1. Does the submission include a packaging plan and sample label that meets ABC Group SQM requirements?


Photo Comment

2. Is the packaging acceptable to ABC Group Purchasing/Logistics?


Photo Comment
IMDS

1. Is IMDS submitted?


Photo Comment

2. Is IMDS approved (Verified At WWW.MDSYSTEM.COM)?


Photo Comment
Part Submission Warrant

1. Is the part name and part number correct?


Photo Comment

2. Are the drawing change level and revision dates correct?


Photo Comment

3. Is the weight of the part in kilograms to three (3) decimal places?


Photo Comment

4. Is the additional EC and/or SMCR number noted (If required)?


Photo Comment

5. Are the production process and production rate provided?


Photo Comment

6. Is the remainder of the form filled in correctly?


Photo Comment

7. Does the action plan to address discrepancies include Interim Approval?


Photo Comment
Run At Rate

1. Has the supplier passed run@rate?


Photo Comment

2. Is the corrective action attached?


Photo Comment
Drawing / Change Documents

1. Is the released drawing at the latest change level and does it match the warrant?


Photo Comment

2. Is the drawing ballooned?


Photo Comment

3. Are all characteristics ballooned and numbered, including notes?


Photo Comment

4. Is the Supplier Engineering Change Request approved?


Photo Comment
Sub-Supplier Information

1. Are the Process Sheets (PSWs) from sub-suppliers included in the submission, and approved?


Photo Comment

2. Is there a Corrective Action plan included with the submission for the interim approved sub-supplier Production Part Approval Process (PPAP)?


Photo Comment

3. Are the sub-suppliers either ISO 9000 certified or compliant with ISO/TS 16949?


Photo Comment
Process Flow Diagram (PFD)

1. Does the diagram accurately reflect the process, including rework and inspection stations?


Photo Comment

2. Is the header information accurate?


Photo Comment

3. Are the relevant process and product characteristics (DC/SC/CC) listed, and do they match with the Control Plan and Drawing?


Photo Comment

4. Are the PFD, CP, and PFMEA linked with the same step numbers, names, processes, etc.?


Photo Comment
Control Plan (CP)

1. Does it comply with the AIAG format or an equivalent standard?


Photo Comment

2. Is the plan type clearly identified as Prototype, Safe Launch/Pre-Production, or Production?


Photo Comment

3. Are DC/SC/CC and other pertinent characteristics identified?


Photo Comment

4. Are the type and frequency of the control deemed adequate?


Photo Comment

5. Does the plan include annual revalidation activities?


Photo Comment

6. Are off-line and/or off-site processes included, such as Rework, Warehouse Activity, Receiving, Shipping, etc.?


Photo Comment

7. Are defect/poke-yoke masters identified where applicable?


Photo Comment
Process Failure Mode Effects And Analysis (PFMEA)

1. Does it comply with the AIAG FMEA Manual, with appropriate rankings?


Photo Comment

2. Do the print date and level match?


Photo Comment

3. Are DC/SC/CCs addressed?


Photo Comment

4. Are the highest RPNs/severity addressed, with a target RPN < 100?


Photo Comment

5. Are typical/historical failure modes addressed?


Photo Comment
Dimensional Results

1. Does the report comply with the AIAG format or an equivalent standard?


Photo Comment

2. Is the correct part number and change level specified?


Photo Comment

3. Are the marked dimensions matched with the ballooned print, and are they within specifications?


Photo Comment

4. Is the OK/NOT OK column checked?


Photo Comment

5. Is the supporting documentation dated within six (6) months, and is the dimensional data within three (3) months?


Photo Comment
Material Tests

1. Does the report comply with the AIAG format or an equivalent standard?


Photo Comment

2. Are the test results reported per specification and/or print?


Photo Comment

3. Do the test results conform with specifications and are performed within six (6) months?


Photo Comment

4. Are the tests performed at an accredited facility, and is there proof of accreditation and scope, such as ISO/TS 16949 Internal Labs - ISO/IEC 17025?


Photo Comment
Material Tests

1. Does the report comply with the AIAG format or an equivalent standard?


Photo Comment

2. Are the test results reported per specification and/or print?


Photo Comment

3. Do the test results conform with specifications and are performed within six (6) months?


Photo Comment

4. Were the tests performed at an accredited facility, and is there proof of accreditation and scope, such as ISO/TS 16949 Internal Labs - ISO/IEC 17025?


Photo Comment
Material Tests

1. Are the studies performed per AIAG standards or an equivalent standard?


Photo Comment

2. Is the part number and change level correct?


Photo Comment

3. Do the Special Characteristics have Cpk studies per SQM requirements?


Photo Comment

4. Is the data normally distributed, and does it meet the SQM Ppk (Short Term) / Cpk (Long Term) requirements?


Photo Comment

5. Were the studies performed within six (6) months of the submission date?


Photo Comment
Material Tests

1. Does the report comply with the AIAG format or an equivalent standard?


Photo Comment

2. Are the gage names and characteristics identified?


Photo Comment

3. Are the studies performed per an acceptable AIAG method?


Photo Comment

4. Are the studies conducted on all gages used on DC/SC/CC features, at a minimum (including On-Line Gages and Testers)?


Photo Comment

5. Are the studies done within six (6) months?


Photo Comment

6. Do the results meet AIAG guidelines (GR&R < 10% acceptable, 10-30% may be Acceptable Based on Application, >30% Need Improvement Plan)?


Photo Comment
Bulk Material

1. Is the PPAP accompanied by a Bulk Materials Checklist that meets SQM requirements?


Photo Comment
Sample Parts

1. Are samples included?


Photo Comment
Checking Aids

1. Are checking aids included?


Photo Comment
Customer Specific Requirements

1. Are additional customer-required documents included?


Photo Comment
Packaging Information

1. Does the submission include a packaging plan and sample label that meets ABC Group SQM requirements?


Photo Comment

2. Is the packaging acceptable to ABC Group Purchasing/Logistics?


Photo Comment
IMDS

1. Is IMDS submitted?


Photo Comment

2. Is IMDS approved (Verified At WWW.MDSYSTEM.COM)?


Photo Comment
Part Submission Warrant

1. Is the part name and part number correct?


Photo Comment

2. Are the drawing change level and revision dates correct?


Photo Comment

3. Is the weight of the part in kilograms to three (3) decimal places?


Photo Comment

4. Is the additional EC and/or SMCR number noted (If required)?


Photo Comment

5. Are the production process and production rate provided?


Photo Comment

6. Is the remainder of the form filled in correctly?


Photo Comment

7. Does the action plan to address discrepancies include Interim Approval?


Photo Comment
Run At Rate

1. Has the supplier passed run@rate?


Photo Comment

2. Is the corrective action attached?


Photo Comment
Drawing / Change Documents

1. Is the released drawing at the latest change level and does it match the warrant?


Photo Comment

2. Is the drawing ballooned?


Photo Comment

3. Are all characteristics ballooned and numbered, including notes?


Photo Comment

4. Is the Supplier Engineering Change Request approved?


Photo Comment
Sub-Supplier Information

1. Are the Process Sheets (PSWs) from sub-suppliers included in the submission, and approved?


Photo Comment

2. Is there a Corrective Action plan included with the submission for the interim approved sub-supplier Production Part Approval Process (PPAP)?


Photo Comment

3. Are the sub-suppliers either ISO 9000 certified or compliant with ISO/TS 16949?


Photo Comment
Process Flow Diagram (PFD)

1. Does the diagram accurately reflect the process, including rework and inspection stations?


Photo Comment

2. Is the header information accurate?


Photo Comment

3. Are the relevant process and product characteristics (DC/SC/CC) listed, and do they match with the Control Plan and Drawing?


Photo Comment

4. Are the PFD, CP, and PFMEA linked with the same step numbers, names, processes, etc.?


Photo Comment

Is this sample what you are looking for?
Sign up to use & customise this template, or create your own custom checklist:

Checklist by GoAudits.com – Please note that this checklist is intended as an example. We do not guarantee compliance with the laws applicable to your territory or industry. You should seek professional advice to determine how this checklist should be adapted to your workplace or jurisdiction.

Seeing is Believing

Get a live demo customized to your unique needs, or get started with a 14-day FREE trial.